←back to thread

GNU Artanis 1.0.0 Released

(artanis.dev)
139 points nalaginrut | 3 comments | 20 Nov 24 14:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.782s | source
Show context
ristos ◴[20 Nov 24 15:23 UTC] No.42194674[source]▶
Nice! is it R7RS compatible? or just specific to Guile?
replies(1): >>42195169 #
1. cassepipe ◴[20 Nov 24 16:02 UTC] No.42195169[source]▶

    ;; NOTE: I won't encourage using Racket but if you really want,
    ;;       I still give you some hints in this tutorial. But the
    ;;       tutorial will base on Guile and RnRs.
I guess so

https://artanis.dev/scheme.html

replies(1): >>42196712 #
2. whartung ◴[20 Nov 24 18:21 UTC] No.42196712[source]▶

  ;; NOTE: I won't encourage using Racket but if you really want,
That's two random, unrelated lightweight jabs at Racket I've seen in the past two days.

Why does Racket have this "bad" reputation in the Scheme community?

replies(1): >>42196856 #
3. zelphirkalt ◴[20 Nov 24 18:39 UTC] No.42196856[source]▶
Not sure. I could imagine it being because it is no longer a Scheme, or the creators and maintainers do no longer want it to be seen as a Scheme. Or perhaps because it introduces differences not adhering to the Scheme standards and therefore Schemers do not like it.

I liked Racket. I only found it difficult to use multiple cores dynamically with it and its places concept and lifting and multiple Racket VMs and all that. Guile seems easier in that regard. But Racket has typed racket and more advanced macro system ...