←back to thread

499 points perihelions | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
mitjam ◴[] No.42193017[source]
It was crossing right on time for the interruptions, a Russian officer was on board, it slowed down while crossing, no other ships were slowing down in that area during that time (rulingnout headwinds) - it cannot get much clearer. China is now participating in hybrid warfare against Europe (unless they present stronger evidence against this assumption)
replies(6): >>42193083 #>>42193168 #>>42193187 #>>42193273 #>>42194394 #>>42194583 #
giraffe_lady ◴[] No.42194394[source]
Why did they leave AIS on?
replies(1): >>42194440 #
diggan ◴[] No.42194440[source]
Having AIS on is mandatory. I'm sure turning it off would raise even higher warning flags than just leaving it on while doing your shady stuff.

Regardless, there are satellites covering the area, so you wouldn't get rid of being tracked anyways, would just be a bit slower.

replies(4): >>42194473 #>>42194508 #>>42194556 #>>42194650 #
1. jeroenhd ◴[] No.42194556[source]
Having AIS on is mandatory, but in practice a lot of ships turn it off regardless. From shadow oil fleets laundering sanctioned oil to fishermen, fake or disabled AIS systems are hardly an exception.

I don't think Russia is trying to hide their sabotage, though. Even with AIS disabled, there's no way European intelligence agencies didn't know what ships were floating above these cables at the time they went down.

This was a warning, not a secret operation.