Discarded delights: The joy of ex-library books (2021)

(www.abebooks.com)

95 points MrVandemar | 3 comments | 20 Nov 24 09:58 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

pglevy ◴[20 Nov 24 12:47 UTC] No.42193458[source]▶

>>42192336 (OP) #

One of my favorites that I return to regularly and am continually fascinated by is an ex-library book, Life at Home in the Twenty-First Century. It's an "enthno-archealogical" study of about 30 families in early 2000s California.

I love the ambiance of libraries and used book stores so I tend to buy books with a little wear and tear and appreciate their uniqueness.

At the same time I'm loathe to make my own marks in books. I hadn't thought about that contradiction before.

replies(1): >>42194374 #

1. vundercind ◴[20 Nov 24 14:50 UTC] No.42194374[source]▶

>>42193458 #

I try to only mark if I think it'll be useful to me, or to someone in the future. I'll lightly mark the location of favorite passages in the margins (that's useful to me, at least, and minimally intrusive), record some information about some obscure reference to a location by an antiquated name that I was only able to track down in some decades-old humanities paper, mark up the TOC with information I wish it had, that kind of thing.

I don't mind most marks from previous readers. Usually I'd rather have them than not, as they're at least interesting in one way or another.

The category of used book with annotations that I don't ever like to buy is one where a previous owner highlighted or underlined seemingly half the book. There's a kind of reader out there who must highlight or underline their books the same way I compulsively select text as I read on a screen, and it wrecks the book.

replies(2): >>42194562 #>>42200905 #

2. clucas ◴[20 Nov 24 15:12 UTC] No.42194562[source]▶

>>42194374 (TP) #