←back to thread

499 points perihelions | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
TinkersW ◴[] No.42193081[source]
This is the 2nd time China did this in that Baltic isn't it? Both times look intentional.. maybe don't allow Chinese ships in the Baltic?
replies(2): >>42193110 #>>42194251 #
1. Arnt ◴[] No.42194251[source]
No it isn't.

Both of the two Chinese registries are open, pretty much anyone can register ships there. It's a bit like the .tv domain — if you see something.tv you can't assume that it's a company in the country Tuvalu.

Look at the nationality of the captain and the beneficial owner instead.

replies(1): >>42197919 #
2. lowbloodsugar ◴[] No.42197919[source]
Right. So they might need some motivation to change that.
replies(1): >>42199181 #
3. frontalier ◴[] No.42199181[source]
what are you implying?

how do you intend to "motivate" a sovereign country?

replies(1): >>42199264 #
4. Sabinus ◴[] No.42199264{3}[source]
Inform them of consequences if they don't make your, hopefully reasonable, changes.

Consequences can range from inconvenient to existential.

replies(1): >>42202422 #
5. Arnt ◴[] No.42202422{4}[source]
Imperialist behaviour won't get you anywhere with a country as large as China.