←back to thread

95 points MrVandemar | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
sofayam ◴[] No.42192915[source]
If you are going to collect books as physical objects, rather than their much more convenient digital versions, then it strikes me you should actually find the signs of previous interactions with that object (library stamps, marks from other readers etc) make them more interesting than pristine copies that no one has read.
replies(6): >>42192968 #>>42193045 #>>42193174 #>>42193372 #>>42193707 #>>42193788 #
iamacyborg ◴[] No.42192968[source]
That runs very much counter to how collectors actually collect books currently. The more pristine the book, the better, aside from particularly rare or valuable inscriptions.
replies(4): >>42193033 #>>42193056 #>>42193119 #>>42193781 #
1. emptiestplace ◴[] No.42193056[source]
Are you actually a bot? I'm struggling to imagine a literate human who does not know this.
replies(1): >>42193867 #
2. iamacyborg ◴[] No.42193867[source]
My name clearly states I am NOT a cyborg.