←back to thread

80 points grecy | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
marviel ◴[] No.42188615[source]
unfortunately they had to scrap the booster Catch, due to undisclosed factors.
replies(4): >>42188635 #>>42188662 #>>42188677 #>>42188734 #
the_king ◴[] No.42188734[source]
I would love to see the dashboard that the team that made the decision was looking at.

I'd be interested to hear speculation by people who know about this as to what they think went wrong. Was it off course? Did the engines not relight in time? Did it not have enough fuel?

replies(3): >>42188785 #>>42189633 #>>42190805 #
piombisallow ◴[] No.42189633[source]
Honestly showing that you can re-target it in flight is extremely impressive too. Like, it still soft-landed in water, it didn't blow up.
replies(3): >>42189689 #>>42189746 #>>42191939 #
1. verzali ◴[] No.42191939[source]
It's not so much a retarget in this case. The water landing is the default path, they have to manually tell it to target the landing pad if it is a go for the catch.
replies(1): >>42195683 #
2. piombisallow ◴[] No.42195683[source]
How does that change anything