←back to thread

Show HN: I built a(nother) house optimized for LAN parties

(lanparty.house)
1071 points kentonv | 1 comments | 16 Nov 24 15:52 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

I wasn't quite sure if this qualified as "Show HN" given you can't really download it and try it out. However, dang said[0]:

> If it's hardware or something that's not so easy to try out over the internet, find a different way to show how it actually works—a video, for example, or a detailed post with photos.

Hopefully I did that?

Additionally, I've put code and a detailed guide for the netboot computer management setup on GitHub:

https://github.com/kentonv/lanparty

Anyway, if this shouldn't have been Show HN, I apologize!

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22336638

Show context
laidoffamazon ◴[16 Nov 24 21:22 UTC] No.42159467[source]▶
This is neat, but as a $NET shareholder and someone with another ~$1m in net worth that can't afford to buy a house for at least another 6 years this makes me think we should significantly increase taxation.
replies(8): >>42159573 #>>42159641 #>>42159944 #>>42160006 #>>42160133 #>>42162628 #>>42162813 #>>42164380 #
compiler-devel ◴[16 Nov 24 22:27 UTC] No.42159944[source]▶
When have increased taxes directly contributed to your take home pay?
replies(3): >>42160011 #>>42160599 #>>42164101 #
IAmGraydon ◴[16 Nov 24 22:36 UTC] No.42160011[source]▶
It doesn’t. They’re just expressing their jealousy in a thinly veiled and highly embarrassing way.
replies(3): >>42160113 #>>42160140 #>>42161675 #
compiler-devel ◴[16 Nov 24 22:50 UTC] No.42160140[source]▶
It truly is embarrassing. Imagine seeing something and thinking, "how can I get the government to forcefully take some of that for my benefit?"
replies(2): >>42160173 #>>42161708 #
alchemist1e9 ◴[17 Nov 24 03:12 UTC] No.42161708{3}[source]▶
Absolutely embarrassing and a real life demonstration of a famous quote:

“I have never understood why it is ‘greed’ to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else’s money.”

replies(1): >>42161806 #
stemlord ◴[17 Nov 24 03:39 UTC] No.42161806{4}[source]▶
To be fair OP's website explains that most of the money isn't earned income. I'm happy for them though
replies(2): >>42164227 #>>42169548 #
compiler-devel ◴[17 Nov 24 14:04 UTC] No.42164227{5}[source]▶
What do you mean by “isn’t earned income” ?
replies(1): >>42166222 #
alchemist1e9 ◴[17 Nov 24 19:10 UTC] No.42166222{6}[source]▶
The anti-capitalists have this crazy idea that investment income isn’t “earned” in the same way that labor income is. Of course that’s absurdly anti-capitalist and completely ignores the point of capitalism and the function of risk taking incentivized by potential rewards. Failing to make a coherent argument against active investment income, for instance entrepreneurs, they will then revert to criticism of passive investors and their eventual complaint will come to arguing S&P index investors should be taxed on “unrealized” gains.

Remember it’s all illogical nonsense motivated by Envy which they masquerade as Empathy.

replies(2): >>42169659 #>>42175869 #
simonhorlick ◴[18 Nov 24 04:13 UTC] No.42169659{7}[source]▶
It's motivated by the ideology of wanting a meritocracy - the idea that if you work hard you can reap rewards. Having some people in society that can sit at home and watch the S&P increase while some have to work 50-hour weeks to make ends meet is seen as problematic.
replies(4): >>42170432 #>>42175901 #>>42191470 #>>42201344 #
1. a96 ◴[20 Nov 24 07:15 UTC] No.42191470{8}[source]▶
And your influence, merit and worth are what you're paid in salary. That sounds sane.