←back to thread

134 points denvaar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
xianshou ◴[] No.42189760[source]
First you ask how the hell someone could come up with this construction.

Then you realize it was this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Demaine

replies(5): >>42189962 #>>42190342 #>>42191446 #>>42191686 #>>42193578 #
1. atq2119 ◴[] No.42191446[source]
And then you read the abstract and realize that this is an improvement of an earlier result using five polygons (which in turn built on a history of earlier results).

So, still a great result, but not as out there as one may think.

I think it's also worth pointing out that in theoretical CS and most of math, it is common to list authors alphabetically. I don't think we have a way of knowing the relative contribution of the two authors. Demaine is obviously accomplished, but I find the kind of hero worship found in this thread distasteful and the facts don't support it here. Give credit to Langerman; Demaine surely would!

replies(1): >>42193957 #