←back to thread

16 points pfirmst | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
pfirmst ◴[] No.42189343[source]
Looking for interested parties to assist maintaining a fork of OpenJDK with authorization. Note this isn't for sandboxing untrusted code but instead only allow loading trusted code and automate generation of principle of least privilege policy files for auditing with user Principal's and Code Signer's.
replies(2): >>42190229 #>>42190244 #
mdaniel ◴[] No.42190229[source]
Two things:

Are you planning on getting the TCK so your JVM will be trustworthy to run in prod?

Are you going to backport these changes to all the concurrent releases, or do potential consumers have to "ride HEAD" to use your JVM? Based on the number of "we're still on Java 8" comments that always show up in any JVM submission, I'd guess one would want to be mindful of the versions their audience requires otherwise it's basically your own private fork

replies(2): >>42190698 #>>42190755 #
1. immibis ◴[] No.42190755[source]
How much does TCK cost again?
replies(1): >>42196926 #
2. mdaniel ◴[] No.42196926[source]
https://openjdk.org/groups/conformance/JckAccess/#:~:text=av...