←back to thread

318 points alexzeitler | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
nextworddev ◴[] No.42188568[source]
Multiply your original estimate by 3, works most of the time
replies(6): >>42188708 #>>42188717 #>>42188735 #>>42188830 #>>42189092 #>>42189098 #
1. rectang ◴[] No.42188717[source]
Multiply by π — it's more accurate.
replies(1): >>42189446 #
2. Moru ◴[] No.42189446[source]
Accurate and precise is different things :)
replies(1): >>42189945 #
3. rectang ◴[] No.42189945[source]
Of course you’re right, however:

1. If we’re talking about bamboozling people who are either ignorant or willfully obtuse, excess precision is a stupid but useful tool for getting a realistic multiple of 3x-4x past them.

2. If the target audience understands excess precision, the excess precision is a nice little in-joke to flatter them and acknowledge their cleverness.

3. The absurdity of the precision illustrates tha very imprecision of the estimate.