←back to thread

93 points rbanffy | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.653s | source
Show context
olao99 ◴[] No.42188229[source]
I fail to understand how these nuclear bomb simulations require so much compute power.

Are they trying to model every single atom?

Is this a case where the physicists in charge get away with programming the most inefficient models possible and then the administration simply replies "oh I guess we'll need a bigger supercomputer"

replies(10): >>42188257 #>>42188268 #>>42188277 #>>42188283 #>>42188293 #>>42188324 #>>42189425 #>>42189704 #>>42189996 #>>42190235 #
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42188293[source]
> Are they trying to model every single atom?

Given all nuclear physics happens inside atoms, I'd hope they're being more precise.

Note that a frontier of fusion physics is characterising plasma flows. So even at the atom-by-atom level, we're nowhere close to a solved problem.

replies(1): >>42188333 #
2. amelius ◴[] No.42188333[source]
Or maybe it suffices to model the whole thing as a gas. It all depends on what they're trying to compute.
replies(1): >>42188352 #
3. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42188352[source]
> maybe it suffices to model the whole thing as a gas

What are you basing this on? Plasmas don't flow like gases even absent a magnetic field. They're self interacting, even in supersonic modes. This is like saying you can just model gases like liquids when trying to describe a plane--they're different states of matter.