←back to thread

473 points Bostonian | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
henearkr ◴[] No.42186615[source]
This whole debate is surrealist.

Bigotry and intolerance are fundamentally irrational and illogical, so the so-called "left-bias" of science is just science being itself.

Now the comments in this HN page and the reason.com article are completely ignoring that, and only considering everything through a political filter.

replies(3): >>42186632 #>>42187607 #>>42188246 #
TheBlight ◴[] No.42186632[source]
Is "intolerance" objectively defined?
replies(1): >>42186677 #
henearkr ◴[] No.42186677[source]
Easy enough: make matter things that have no reason to matter.

Like what the skin color has to do with how good your physician is? Nothing.

Science is smart enough to propose the adequate metrics, in this case it does absolutely not include melanin.

replies(4): >>42187694 #>>42187843 #>>42188205 #>>42188281 #
1. someuser2345 ◴[] No.42188205{3}[source]
It's left leaning universities that push for affirmative action policies, which do judge people based on their melanin.
replies(1): >>42192063 #
2. henearkr ◴[] No.42192063[source]
That is intended to be a transient mechanism, to evolve towards a more balanced status quo after it has ended.