←back to thread

The tragedy of running an old Node project

(abdisalan.com)
272 points abdisalan | 2 comments | 18 Nov 24 18:24 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mvkel ◴[18 Nov 24 19:03 UTC] No.42175730[source]▶
> time to run it after not touching it for 4 years

> Two hours of my life gone...

Two hours of work after 4 years sounds ... perfectly acceptable?

And it would have run perfectly right away if the node version was specified, so a good learning, too

This feels like making a mountain out of a mole hill

replies(21): >>42175799 #>>42175818 #>>42175826 #>>42175846 #>>42176217 #>>42176305 #>>42176788 #>>42176958 #>>42181497 #>>42182299 #>>42182564 #>>42182778 #>>42183020 #>>42183093 #>>42183501 #>>42183725 #>>42184814 #>>42192770 #>>42193606 #>>42194518 #>>42211558 #
ivan_gammel ◴[19 Nov 24 13:19 UTC] No.42183093[source]▶
I still can open my decade-old Java projects, run build with modern Maven/JDK and get working code - in a few minutes. Two hours of dancing with a drum doesn’t feel acceptable to me.
replies(5): >>42183272 #>>42183987 #>>42184062 #>>42184422 #>>42187870 #
1. jvanderbot ◴[19 Nov 24 20:41 UTC] No.42187870[source]▶
`make` works pretty well on ... everything I've written that I kept since then.

`cmake ..` otoh, tends not to.

replies(1): >>42194141 #
2. jeroenhd ◴[20 Nov 24 14:23 UTC] No.42194141[source]▶
`make` itself works fine, that hasn't changed in decades. That doesn't mean the tooling `make` scripts kick into gear still exist, or work, or do the same things, though. Makefiles don't fix the dependency on a fifteen year old C compiler.