←back to thread

473 points Bostonian | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.423s | source
Show context
nyeah ◴[] No.42184916[source]
The Reason article blurs the distinction between SciAm's opinion pieces and its factual (or putatively factual) reporting. That's disconcerting. "Opinion piece" objectively means "free bullshit zone". Reason is usually much more responsible than this.

SciAm has of course fallen into terrible disrepair. But that happened long ago and the cause wasn't BS in the editorials. Who even reads editorials in a science magazine?

I was a Young Libertarian in my day and I recognize the urge to blame lunatics who disagree with my politics for everything wrong in the world. But this particular case isn't convincing. It died and then the loonies moved in, not the other way around.

replies(7): >>42184966 #>>42186009 #>>42186071 #>>42186342 #>>42186445 #>>42186446 #>>42186596 #
1. WalterBright ◴[] No.42186071[source]
I've seen some of their science articles veer into political assertions.
replies(1): >>42186257 #
2. nyeah ◴[] No.42186257[source]
I can't read it at all, so I have no reason to disagree.