←back to thread

179 points yatrios | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.7s | source | bottom
1. zusammen ◴[] No.42185351[source]
As soon as I saw “shift left” I knew I wanted to double down.
replies(3): >>42186869 #>>42187021 #>>42192071 #
2. vardump ◴[] No.42186869[source]
This kind of joke might multiply…
replies(2): >>42188312 #>>42188627 #
3. munchler ◴[] No.42187021[source]
Way to manage up.
4. zusammen ◴[] No.42188312[source]
Bit hack humor: sometimes it pops and counts—but sometimes it’s rot-ten.

That might have been a bit mask-off. I’m sorry.

5. jounker ◴[] No.42188627[source]
There’s a rot in here somewhere
6. globnomulous ◴[] No.42192071[source]
Bingo. I started reading the article and found it to be packed with jargon, buzz words, and the language of breathless prophecy and faddish hype. I couldn't hear the point of the article over the blasting sirens of my BS detectors, so I just stopped reading. Seriously, is there anything in the article worth the effort of slogging through all of that business-school/project-management shorthand/nonsense?