←back to thread

392 points seanhunter | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
japoco ◴[] No.42184331[source]
This is probably just because the coins aren’t actually fair. If the coin is slightly biased towards heads, the first throw is more likely to heads, and so are all subsequent throws. Same for tails.
replies(2): >>42184385 #>>42184417 #
Vecr ◴[] No.42184385[source]
That's not the problem. You can test that by using a highly secure random number generator, e.g. /dev/random in Linux, to select the initial side. Keep track of that initial side, record the side it lands on. This paper shows a same-side bias, not a heads bias.
replies(1): >>42184497 #
japoco ◴[] No.42184497[source]
A same side bias is either a heads bias or a tails bias.
replies(2): >>42184551 #>>42184611 #
alt227 ◴[] No.42184551[source]
Its not, its a bias towards which side the coin started on.
replies(1): >>42184586 #
japoco ◴[] No.42184586[source]
Which is either heads or tails.
replies(2): >>42184964 #>>42185041 #
1. glxxyz ◴[] No.42184964[source]
A coin with a heads bias is more likely to land on heads no matter how it's thrown.

A coin with a same side bias is more likely to land on heads if it's thrown with heads facing up, and more likely to land on tails if thrown with with tails facing up.