←back to thread

473 points Bostonian | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
alistairSH ◴[] No.42183843[source]
Does the author not understand the concept of "opinion piece"? Every "article" he takes issue with is NOT a scientific article, but an opinion piece.
replies(10): >>42183882 #>>42183968 #>>42184036 #>>42184071 #>>42184124 #>>42184194 #>>42184196 #>>42184198 #>>42184592 #>>42184655 #
someuser2345 ◴[] No.42184198[source]
Scientific American isn't a social media platform; by publishing these opinion pieces, they implicitly support them. Would you be ok if they published an opinion piece bashing evolution and defending creationism?
replies(5): >>42184381 #>>42184643 #>>42186426 #>>42186512 #>>42186851 #
1. alistairSH ◴[] No.42184643[source]
I expect them to publish op/ed pieces they believe their subscribers will find interesting. As long as they're clearer labeled as opinion, what's the problem? Op/ed pieces have been part of journalism pretty much forever.