←back to thread

152 points voisin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
GratiaTerra ◴[] No.42173899[source]
I took advantage of the IRA solar power and $7500 EV credit, now I have an off grid home all electric appliances and excess power for hot tubs and EV's. The Ford Lightning acts as a generator. This was the greatest most life changing and impactful legistlation ever: I've had $0 (ZERO!) in gasoline, LP, and electric utility bills since installation last year.
replies(9): >>42173953 #>>42174010 #>>42174147 #>>42174208 #>>42174360 #>>42174605 #>>42174658 #>>42174799 #>>42175124 #
asciimov ◴[] No.42174360[source]
It's too bad that the only people benefiting from all green power subsidies are the people that least need them.

We should be investing solar in lower income communities, as those people could really use cheaper utilities, and any saving they get would immediately go back into their communities.

replies(13): >>42174405 #>>42174541 #>>42174601 #>>42174639 #>>42174918 #>>42174923 #>>42175135 #>>42175258 #>>42175281 #>>42175784 #>>42180826 #>>42181887 #>>42189172 #
epistasis ◴[] No.42174918[source]
That's an odd way of looking at it.

Those who are most able to pay for it are those who are paying for the highest initial costs, lowering the costs for everyone else by improvements in the technology, and making it easier for others to adopt later. Early adopters take lots of risk on things not working out well, and learning what things can go wrong and how to fix them (at additional expense, too.)

This is much better than those who are least able to pay being made to shoulder the cost and risks of being early adopters.

replies(4): >>42175385 #>>42175506 #>>42184578 #>>42185115 #
1. c22 ◴[] No.42184578{3}[source]
Those who are most able to pay for it likely have larger energy footprints too, so it's possible prioritizing this demographic gives you more bang for your buck in emissions reductions.