←back to thread

20 years of Google Scholar

(blog.google)
412 points thepuppet33r | 1 comments | 18 Nov 24 18:01 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
teruakohatu ◴[18 Nov 24 20:59 UTC] No.42176959[source]▶
The best thing, by a long way, that Google Scholar has achieved is denying Elsevier & co a monopoly on academic search.

In most universities here in New Zealand, articles have to be published in a journal indexed by Elsevier's Scopus. Not in a Scopus-indexed journal, it does not count anymore than a reddit comment. This gives Elsevier tremendous power. But in CS/ML/AI most academics and students turn to Google Scholar first when doing searches.

replies(2): >>42177049 #>>42182014 #
freefaler ◴[18 Nov 24 21:07 UTC] No.42177049[source]▶
or turn to sci-hub and annas-arhive :)
replies(5): >>42177217 #>>42177399 #>>42177609 #>>42177877 #>>42179815 #
thrdbndndn ◴[19 Nov 24 03:20 UTC] No.42179815[source]▶
I'm a proud user of sci-hub but when I was still in academics, I have never used it. My school has access to all the journals I ever needed, plus more old non-digitized ones I can borrow from library (including interlibrary access).
replies(4): >>42180692 #>>42180777 #>>42183406 #>>42185587 #
1. ryzvonusef ◴[19 Nov 24 13:51 UTC] No.42183406[source]▶
It depends on the discipline, also the mode of learning (I'm distance learning so no physical library access).

My uni (Northampton) has access to a LOT of journals... but has a blindspot in management, specifically accountancy focus journals; am doing my lit review for my MSc dissertation and the number of times I hit a dead end is frustrating.

Sci-hub and Annas-Archive are also not interested in that segment, so double whammy.

But surprisingly Archive.org was able to help me out a bit, so thanks for that.