←back to thread

473 points Bostonian | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
bashmelek ◴[] No.42178778[source]
To be honest, even 18 years ago, long before this editor in chief, I found Scientific American rather ideological. Maybe it got more obvious over time, but I don’t see its recent tone categorically different.
replies(7): >>42178909 #>>42178941 #>>42179009 #>>42179088 #>>42181722 #>>42183055 #>>42183064 #
1. ◴[] No.42183064[source]