(reason.com)

473 points Bostonian | 1 comments | 18 Nov 24 22:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.246s | source

Show context

bashmelek ◴[19 Nov 24 00:17 UTC] No.42178778[source]▶

To be honest, even 18 years ago, long before this editor in chief, I found Scientific American rather ideological. Maybe it got more obvious over time, but I don’t see its recent tone categorically different.

replies(7): >>42178909 #>>42178941 #>>42179009 #>>42179088 #>>42181722 #>>42183055 #>>42183064 #

1. ◴[19 Nov 24 13:14 UTC] No.42183055[source]▶

>>42178778 #

↑

Scientific American's departing editor and the politicization of science