←back to thread

473 points Bostonian | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.227s | source
Show context
wrp ◴[] No.42179097[source]
I loved Scientific American as it was in the 1970s-80s, and was saddened to see what happened to it after around 2000(?), but I can see how having an editor like Helmuth would be a rational choice for the owners. The purpose of a commercial magazine is to generate income, and as Fox/CNN/NYT/Guardian realized, being objectively informative is a sub-optimal approach. I do wonder how we can ever again have something like the old Scientific American.
replies(3): >>42182226 #>>42183038 #>>42184051 #
1. ◴[] No.42183038[source]