←back to thread

It's time to replace TCP in the datacenter (2023)

(arxiv.org)
188 points ilove_banh_mi | 2 comments | 18 Nov 24 01:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
UltraSane ◴[18 Nov 24 05:43 UTC] No.42170007[source]▶
I wonder why Fibre Channel isn't used as a replacement for TCP in the datacenter. It is a very robust L3 protocol. It was designed to connect block storage devices to servers while making the OS think they are directly connected. OSs do NOT tolerate dropped data when reading and writing to block devices and so Fibre Channel has a extremely robust Token Bucket algorithm. The algo prevents congestion by allowing receivers to control how much data senders can send. I have worked with a lot of VMware clusters that use FC to connect servers to storage arrays and it has ALWAYS worked perfectly.
replies(9): >>42170384 #>>42170465 #>>42170698 #>>42171057 #>>42171576 #>>42171890 #>>42174071 #>>42174140 #>>42175585 #
YZF ◴[18 Nov 24 07:24 UTC] No.42170465[source]▶
Are you suggesting some protocol layer of Fibre Channel to be used over IP over Ethernet?

TCP (in practice) runs on top of (mostly) routed IP networks and network architectures. E.g. a spine/leaf network with BGP. Fibre Channel as I understand it is mostly used in more or less point to point connections? I do see some mention of "Switched Fabric" but is that very common?

replies(1): >>42171091 #
UltraSane ◴[18 Nov 24 09:55 UTC] No.42171091[source]▶
Fibre Channel is a routed L3 protocol that can support loop-free multi-path typologies.
replies(1): >>42179900 #
1. YZF ◴[19 Nov 24 03:37 UTC] No.42179900[source]▶
I'll admit I'm not familiar with the routing protocols used for Fibre Channel. Is there some equivalent of BGP? How well does it scale? What vendors sell FC switches and what's the cost compared to Ethernet/IP/TCP?
replies(1): >>42180728 #
2. UltraSane ◴[19 Nov 24 07:04 UTC] No.42180728[source]▶
FC uses Fabric Shortest Path First, which is a lot like OSPF. It can scale to 2^64 ports. There is no FC equivalent of BGP. Broadcom, Cisco, HP, Lenovo, IBM sell FC switches, but some of them are probably rebadged Broadcom switches. The worst thing about FC is that the switches are licensed per port so you might not be able to use all the ports on the device. A brocade G720 with 24 32Gb usable ports is $28,000 on CDW. It has 64 physical ports. a 24 port license is $31,000 on CDW. So it is REALLY freaking expensive. But for servers a company can't make money without it is absolutely worth it. One place I worked had a old EMC FC SAN with 8 years of 100% uptime.