Extending the context length to 1M tokens

(qwenlm.github.io)

114 points cmcconomy | 1 comments | 18 Nov 24 16:27 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

anon291 ◴[18 Nov 24 17:49 UTC] No.42174879[source]▶

Can we all agree that these models far surpass human intelligence now? I mean they process hours worth of audio in less time than it would take a human to even listen. I think the singularity passed and we didn't even notice (which would be expected)

replies(11): >>42174949 #>>42174987 #>>42175002 #>>42175008 #>>42175019 #>>42175095 #>>42175118 #>>42175171 #>>42175223 #>>42175324 #>>42176838 #

Spartan-S63 ◴[18 Nov 24 17:55 UTC] No.42174949[source]▶

>>42174879 #

No, I can't agree that these models surpass human intelligence. Sure, they're good at probabilistic recall, but they aren't reasoning and they aren't synthesizing anything novel.

replies(2): >>42175058 #>>42175097 #

anon291 ◴[18 Nov 24 18:04 UTC] No.42175058[source]▶

>>42174949 #

> they aren't synthesizing anything novel.

ChatGPT has synthesized my past three vacations and regularly plans my family's meals based on whatever is in my fridge. I completely disagree.

replies(2): >>42175127 #>>42179516 #

1. grugagag ◴[19 Nov 24 02:20 UTC] No.42179516[source]▶

>>42175058 #

> ChatGPT has synthesized my past three vacations and regularly plans my family's meals based on whatever is in my fridge. I completely disagree.

What do you mean synthetised your vacations? You seem to be very passionate with ChatGPT to entrust it with making decisions on your meals but I suspect the novelty will wear off for you too. I use ChayGPT from time to time and admit Im pleasantly surprised by the outcome when it all works out, but Im not swayed to think it is reasoning the way we do, it’s just a tool after all.

↑