←back to thread

Scientific American's departing editor and the politicization of science

(reason.com)
473 points Bostonian | 1 comments | 18 Nov 24 22:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.225s | source
Show context
bashmelek ◴[19 Nov 24 00:17 UTC] No.42178778[source]▶
To be honest, even 18 years ago, long before this editor in chief, I found Scientific American rather ideological. Maybe it got more obvious over time, but I don’t see its recent tone categorically different.
replies(7): >>42178909 #>>42178941 #>>42179009 #>>42179088 #>>42181722 #>>42183055 #>>42183064 #
1. jgalt212 ◴[19 Nov 24 00:37 UTC] No.42178941[source]▶
True. SciAm has been broken for a long time. The same can be said for most magazines, but SciAm being broken probably just hurts more for our crowd.