←back to thread

20 years of Google Scholar

(blog.google)
418 points thepuppet33r | 1 comments | 18 Nov 24 18:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
zeroonetwothree ◴[18 Nov 24 19:01 UTC] No.42175714[source]▶
Google Scholar is so good. I started doing research right when it came out and it was amazingly helpful. I can’t imagine how it was done before.
replies(4): >>42175801 #>>42176741 #>>42177679 #>>42186276 #
1. dekhn ◴[18 Nov 24 22:12 UTC] No.42177679[source]▶
I'd go to the card catalog (index), turn my question into a bag of words (tokenize), fetch all the cards matching each token (posting lists), drop cards which didn't include enough of the tokens (posting list intersection), ordering the cards by the number of tokens they matched (keyword match ranking), filter at some cutoff, and then reorder based on the h-index of the author (page rank). Then I would read each paper in order, following citations in a breadth-first manner.

(the above is a joke comparing old school library work to search engines circa 2000; I didn't actually do all those steps. I'd usually just find the most recent review article and read the papers it cited).