←back to thread

577 points mooreds | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
leshokunin ◴[] No.42176328[source]
The constant Russian interference, combined with the regular escalation from the jets patrolling, and the radar jamming, really needs to be dealt with.

We're stuck between having to do timid actions and full NATO escalation. This feels like constant creep.

replies(9): >>42176387 #>>42176516 #>>42176555 #>>42176659 #>>42176846 #>>42176978 #>>42177068 #>>42177307 #>>42178494 #
meiraleal[dead post] ◴[] No.42176516[source]
[flagged]
georgeecollins ◴[] No.42176686[source]
The only time NATO has actually gotten involved in a conflict was in Afghanistan after 911. So no, it is not only because of Russia.
replies(4): >>42176944 #>>42177029 #>>42177173 #>>42178054 #
RobotToaster ◴[] No.42176944[source]
Yugoslavia?
replies(1): >>42177058 #
1. VagabundoP ◴[] No.42177058[source]
That was not a NATO action.
replies(4): >>42177081 #>>42177122 #>>42177219 #>>42178973 #
2. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42177081[source]
Yes, it was [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia

3. PKop ◴[] No.42177122[source]
Why do you say that?
replies(1): >>42181558 #
4. dragonwriter ◴[] No.42177219[source]
I’m not sure if you are referring to the NATO intervention in the first part of the wars as Yugoslavia broke up (Bosnia, primarily starting in 1992) or later (the NATO-Yugoslavia war over Kosovo, starting 1999) or layer yet (the NATO involvement in the internal conflict of then-NATO partner North Macedonia in 2001), but all three were official NATO operations (and listed as such on NATO’s website.)
5. blashyrk ◴[] No.42178973[source]
It's literally on the NATO website for crying out loud.
6. sabbaticaldev ◴[] No.42181558[source]
because he’s a normal brainwashed westerner. Still not understanding why they lost the NATO/ukraine vs russia war