←back to thread

Against Best Practices

(www.arp242.net)
279 points ingve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
agentultra ◴[] No.42172433[source]
I think the rejection is too strong in this article. The idea of, “best practices,” comes from an established Body of Knowledge. There is one published for software development called the SoftWare Engineering Body of Knowledge or SWEBOK; published by the IEEE.

The author seems to be arguing for nuance: that these “laws,” require context and shouldn’t be applied blindly. I agree.

However they shouldn’t be rejected out of hand either and people recommending them aren’t idiots.

Update: one problem with “best practices,” that I think the article might have unwittingly implied is that most software developers aren’t aware of SWEBOK and are repeating maxims and aphorisms they heard from others. Software development is often powered by folklore and hand waving.

replies(7): >>42172691 #>>42173545 #>>42175036 #>>42175396 #>>42176186 #>>42177350 #>>42178640 #
1. ozim ◴[] No.42175396[source]
*However they shouldn’t be rejected out of hand either and people recommending them aren’t idiots.*

Also it shouldn't be taken for granted that best practice is always "best/good" - there definitely are idiots recommending best practices.