←back to thread

113 points concerto | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
Mistletoe[dead post] ◴[] No.42174256[source]
[flagged]
mikewarot ◴[] No.42174492[source]
Putin's successor is likely to be someone even less securely in power, and thus far less rational. I don't want to test our luck with what's left of the Soviet nuclear arsenal.
replies(5): >>42174582 #>>42174777 #>>42175261 #>>42175307 #>>42177680 #
rootusrootus ◴[] No.42174777[source]
My greatest hope at this point is that much of the Soviet arsenal would fail to function at this point. That might be a pipe dream, but it's what I got.
replies(2): >>42175005 #>>42175039 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.42175005[source]
Can we not bribe enough Russians to dismantle what is left? Visas, fiat, whatever, spend to disable. We’ll come cleanup the warheads later.

https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/what-happened-sovie...

https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/history/post-cold-war-worl...

replies(1): >>42175155 #
1. nostrademons ◴[] No.42175155[source]
Don't need to bribe them, the free market takes care of that.

There are reports that much of the tritium in Russian nukes has been stolen and sold on the black market. When you have a culture that is basically a kleptocracy, few internal controls, and tritium prices of $30K/gram, it doesn't take a genius to figure out where the incentives lie.