←back to thread

Teen behind hundreds of swatting attacks pleads guilty to federal charges

(www.wired.com)
242 points LinuxBender | 1 comments | 18 Nov 24 00:39 UTC | HN request time: 0.327s | source
Show context
elzbardico ◴[18 Nov 24 14:55 UTC] No.42172833[source]▶
The militarization of law enforcement and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
replies(7): >>42172921 #>>42173336 #>>42173392 #>>42173879 #>>42174586 #>>42174631 #>>42183686 #
valval ◴[18 Nov 24 15:36 UTC] No.42173336[source]▶
Not at all. It’s good that law enforcement have the tools to deal with serious threats. You’re just throwing around a fear word.

The big guns are hidden from sight anyway, and only brought out when need be. We don’t need any Oct 7th type attacks happening on home soil.

replies(4): >>42173365 #>>42173420 #>>42173582 #>>42183783 #
slightwinder ◴[18 Nov 24 15:42 UTC] No.42173420[source]▶
> We don’t need any Oct 7th type attacks happening on home soil.

USA has 1-2 mass shootings everyday on average. This is far worse than a singular big attack. And how long would the reaction of police to any big attack even take? Is it actually realistic that they will have a useful impact with big guns?

replies(2): >>42173546 #>>42173579 #
potato3732842 ◴[18 Nov 24 15:53 UTC] No.42173546[source]▶
>USA has 1-2 mass shootings everyday on average.

2+ victims is a mass shooting per the FBI definition so while what you say is technically true it's also a particularly evil way to mislead the reader as the typical mass shooting of the FBI definition consists of 2-4 people shot over the course of an otherwise normal crime wheres the colloquial definition of "mass shooting" is more along the lines of a crazy suicidal person killing as many others as they can.

replies(1): >>42174012 #
agubelu ◴[18 Nov 24 16:32 UTC] No.42174012[source]▶
The USA is the only first-world country I'm aware of where many people are happy to argue that a 2+ victim shooting (in any context) is NOT a mass shooting.
replies(2): >>42174961 #>>42182782 #
1. tomsmeding ◴[18 Nov 24 17:56 UTC] No.42174961[source]▶
"2" being a large number of people to be killed in a crime does not necessarily make it sensible (to me, a Dutchman, very much not American) to call that crime a "mass shooting". If the crime was e.g. a bank robbery (sorry for the unimaginative example), and they shot a member of staff and later a civilian to get away, then that's a robbery with two dead, not a mass shooting. What people imagine when you say "mass shooting" is sensational stories from (predominantly) the US where some mad kid takes a gun to a school and shoots around. If that kid shoots 2 people, that's a mass shooting with 2 dead.