←back to thread

113 points concerto | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
petesergeant ◴[] No.42174532[source]
Exceptionally well-armed NATO + JEF members, and Finland well within distance to use conventional artillery to turn St Petersburg to rubble. This is a public-awareness and support-building exercise rather than a real concern. This is like the RAF frequently issuing press-releases about intercepting Russian jets.
replies(6): >>42174590 #>>42174598 #>>42174714 #>>42174864 #>>42175880 #>>42177211 #
mdp2021 ◴[] No.42174590[source]
> conventional artillery to turn St Petersburg to rubble

Well, let's really hope not. (Let us hope that nothing of worth is ever destroyed, and let us not speak about destruction of universal goods lightly.)

Edit: let us be even more clear (possibly in light of the dismissing feelers who just passed by). If you are into destruction of the cultural heritage, you are the enemy. Complexities just come later.

replies(3): >>42174621 #>>42174655 #>>42189472 #
soco ◴[] No.42174655[source]
Are human lives worthwhile to be destroyed? Are they not universal enough? Because I don't see much respect for those around the world... starting, but not ending there, with the russian soldiers themselves.
replies(1): >>42174695 #
1. mdp2021 ◴[] No.42174695[source]
Some will be of the opinion that what may not respect cultural heritage may not have the same worth.

Sorry.

Edit: I will express it again, and to stress the point: some things are the fruit of the drive towards construction. Some other things may be destroyers. So, it all depends. No, we will not attribute worth to destroyers.