←back to thread

249 points jaboutboul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.37s | source
Show context
neilv ◴[] No.42131010[source]
> "This is obvious political retribution by the outgoing administration against Polymarket for providing a market that correctly called the 2024 presidential election," a Polymarket spokesperson tells Axios.

When I saw that statement, from a company spokesperson, it was striking.

Is it now respectable and advisable for a corporation to make official statements like this?

replies(11): >>42131031 #>>42131033 #>>42131037 #>>42131288 #>>42131422 #>>42131547 #>>42131653 #>>42131753 #>>42132315 #>>42132991 #>>42136393 #
ronsor ◴[] No.42131037[source]
Corporations have been making these kinds of statements for almost the past decade.
replies(2): >>42131151 #>>42131561 #
PittleyDunkin ◴[] No.42131151[source]
Have corporations ever not played the "aggrieved victim" card?
replies(1): >>42131159 #
ronsor ◴[] No.42131159[source]
The social/political appeal part is the new part. Companies have always released "we did nothing wrong" statements.
replies(1): >>42131548 #
ethagnawl ◴[] No.42131548[source]
Yeah, the reflexive accusations of "witch hunts" and "crooked hit jobs" are a recent development. Their lineage is obvious and ... I guess you can't blame them because they (somehow) play with a significant percentage of the population.
replies(1): >>42131944 #
cj ◴[] No.42131944[source]
Blaming the incident on “political retribution” (their words) implies that the US government is corrupt.

Such a weird thing to blame it on.

replies(3): >>42132029 #>>42138931 #>>42173631 #
1. hulitu ◴[] No.42173631[source]
> Such a weird thing to blame it on.

Yeah, should't be weird, should be obvious. (lobby, insider trading, etc)