←back to thread

242 points LinuxBender | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
BLKNSLVR ◴[] No.42169029[source]
I'm unwisely and unadvisedly wading into this half-cocked.

Swatting wouldn't even be a thing if <any number of logical things>

- Anonymous calls should be treated with high levels of suspicion as to their legitimacy

- First response training that's even moderately appropriate

- Situational awareness beyond what one's been informed by third parties

- Empathy for all humans

- Any kind of notion of that a scenario may not actually be as described by a single anonymous voice

A very (un)funny irony is that there are numerous stories I've read about domestic violence victims being arrested, as opposed to the attacker, which implies there's some level of suspicion in some circumstances about the information the police are being fed. Swatting, as a thing, indicates there's some kind of hero-pressure build-up that overrules any kind of <all the things I listed above> whereby that pressure has the possibility of impending release.

replies(5): >>42169059 #>>42169065 #>>42169237 #>>42169267 #>>42172756 #
stavros ◴[] No.42169065[source]
It's a US cultural thing to either avoid blaming the police for anything, or make excuses for them. Brutal police behavior is seen as either acceptable, or what even desirable. I've seen reddit posts where a protester slightly taunts the police and gets pepper sprayed in the face, and all the commenters were gleefully saying things like "fuck around and find out", without even thinking that maybe there wasn't enough fucking around to warrant any finding out.

When you try and point this out, you're called various names, because apparently you either support the police 100%, or you're a criminal.

replies(6): >>42169146 #>>42169180 #>>42169204 #>>42169352 #>>42169696 #>>42169949 #
ClassyJacket[dead post] ◴[] No.42169204[source]
[flagged]
jrmg ◴[] No.42169240[source]
Around 1000 people per year, which I absolutely agree is terrible - but at the same time, the population is over 300,000,000 so it stretches the meaning of the word to call it ‘regular’.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-de...

replies(5): >>42169329 #>>42169336 #>>42169423 #>>42169448 #>>42169622 #
Manuel_D ◴[] No.42169448[source]
Of those 1000 people, the vast majority are armed and actively threatening either the public, the police officers themselves or both.
replies(1): >>42173217 #
1. bcdtttt ◴[] No.42173217[source]
According to the cops. The same cops who shoot people for having wallets and sticks. Same cops who beat Deaf people for not following verbal instructions. Same cops who shoot autistic folks.

Yeah, I don't think "armed" means "was an imminent threat to life" in the slightest. It's much more likely it's a cover your ass designation.

replies(1): >>42174001 #
2. Manuel_D ◴[] No.42174001[source]
No, according to third party police use of force tracking projects: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/polic...