←back to thread

242 points LinuxBender | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.446s | source
Show context
plagiarist ◴[] No.42168920[source]
It should really not be possible for a single anonymous phone call to dispatch a heavily armed response team to break down someone's door.

Aside from that, people who do so are despicable. 20 years is a light sentence. Taking money to put people in situations that could easily become deadly.

replies(5): >>42168950 #>>42168973 #>>42168992 #>>42169045 #>>42169561 #
rgmerk ◴[] No.42169561[source]
To be ever so slightly sympathetic to American cops, unlike just about anywhere else in the developed world, it is plausible that the person behind the door is armed with anything up to an automatic rifle, and any random person they stop may be carrying a concealed firearm.

Given that, if I was busting down doors in the US, I’d want to be armed to the teeth, equipped with the best body armour money can buy, and wouldn’t waste a lot of time on niceties until I was sure that nobody was going to attempt to kill me.

Blame the Second Amendment as currently interpreted.

replies(4): >>42170533 #>>42172701 #>>42172778 #>>42173644 #
GuestFAUniverse ◴[] No.42170533[source]
Simple solution: only allow weapons that existed during the creation of the Second Amendment.
replies(4): >>42172648 #>>42172716 #>>42174570 #>>42175130 #
lupusreal ◴[] No.42172648[source]
Ban mechanical printing presses too then.
replies(1): >>42173042 #
1. 1986 ◴[] No.42173042[source]
The printing press predates the 1st Amendment
replies(1): >>42174440 #
2. lupusreal ◴[] No.42174440[source]
Not the fully automatic machine presses. The founding fathers had printing presses that had to be hand loaded one page at a time. Clearly, they had no ability to conceive of more advanced technology than that.