←back to thread

83 points lnyan | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.851s | source
1. FloatArtifact ◴[] No.42172797[source]
It would be really neat for 3D printing and scanning. However, I don't think it'll work with functional prints given dimensional accuracy is important. photogrammetry still has a 1-up on this I believe.
replies(3): >>42173121 #>>42173222 #>>42186707 #
2. causal ◴[] No.42173121[source]
Would love to get away from photogrammetry the day splatting gets good enough
3. peppertree ◴[] No.42173222[source]
There’s work done around DeepSDF that do latent space diffusion but you end with a solid geometry suitable for 3D printing.
4. antiraza ◴[] No.42186707[source]
hackernews weirdness has forced this roundabout way of replying to you about a thread from a bit ago...

i stumbled on your post about eye tracking needs for a relative dealing with MS.

i have some previous experience working with the tobii 4c and the 5 using more off-the-shelf solutions, as well as the more 'true medical grade' side of the tech, and may have some recommendations and learnings to share.

i have temporarily added a way to contact me into the about section of my profile. once i hear from you, or in about a week, i'll clear that out.

drop a line if you're interesting in discussing.

replies(1): >>42211148 #
5. FloatArtifact ◴[] No.42211148[source]
Alright, I've reached out via email. Thank you for going out of your way to connect.