←back to thread

130 points bentocorp | 8 comments | | HN request time: 3.768s | source | bottom
Show context
bastloing ◴[] No.42171982[source]
That's great news! Now if they can solve the same problem with sea water, California, Arizona and Nevada can reduce their reliance on the Colorado river and grow more crops. It is only a matter of time before it's solved. Great work, MIT!
replies(3): >>42172316 #>>42172543 #>>42172816 #
1. fred_is_fred ◴[] No.42172543[source]
Even if you could do this you'd have to pump the water back uphill to NV and AZ.
replies(4): >>42172836 #>>42173738 #>>42175015 #>>42175064 #
2. dylan604 ◴[] No.42172836[source]
Just install some additional solar powered pumps along the way
replies(1): >>42173952 #
3. aidenn0 ◴[] No.42173738[source]
Could you save on pumping energy by sending the water to underground aquifers rather than the surface?
4. fred_is_fred ◴[] No.42173952[source]
The amount of energy needed to pump enough water for ag uphill is insane. Well beyond "just" throwing some solar panels out there. If it was that easy we'd pump Mississippi water into west Texas (which there was a plan to do in the 60s with nuke plants, but I cannot find the name right now).
replies(1): >>42174057 #
5. dylan604 ◴[] No.42174057{3}[source]
i left off the /s as to me anytime someone starts a comment off with "just ____" is usually a farcical idea. like just remove the salt from water and boom, done.
replies(1): >>42177505 #
6. bastloing ◴[] No.42175015[source]
Ok, so it's two problems to solve. Get on it MIT!
7. itscrush ◴[] No.42175064[source]
No, start with modifying the Colorado River Compact and other underlying agreements to allow more upstream retention than is currently allotted.
8. fred_is_fred ◴[] No.42177505{4}[source]
Hah! It can be a very HN comment to "just" something especially around physical engineering.