←back to thread

Please stop the coding challenges

(blackentropy.bearblog.dev)
261 points CrazyEmi | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
CharlieDigital ◴[] No.42148313[source]
A small anecdote.

A partner of a friend quit their job earlier this year. They then took 4-6 weeks to prepare for each interview with Big Tech companies (4-6 weeks for Meta, 4-6 weeks for Stripe, etc.). Along the way, they also took random interviews just to practice and build muscle memory. They would grind leetcode several hours a day after researching which questions were likely to be encountered at each Big Tech.

This paid off and they accepted an offer for L6/staff at a MAANG.

Talked to them this week (haven't even started the new role) and they've already forgotten the details of most of what was practiced. They said that the hardest part was studying for the system design portion because they did not have experience with system design...but now made staff eng. at a MAANG. IRL, this individual is a good but not exceptional engineer having worked with them on a small project.

Wild; absolutely wild and I feel like explains a lot of the boom and bust hiring cycles. When I watch some of the system design interview prep videos, it's just a script. You'll go into the call and all you need to do is largely follow the script. It doesn't matter if you've actually designed similar or more complex systems; the point of the system design interview is apparently "do you know the script"?

Watch these two back to back at 2x speed and marvel at how much of this is executed like a script:

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_qu1F9BXow

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K-eupuDVEc

replies(14): >>42148339 #>>42148377 #>>42148639 #>>42149124 #>>42149251 #>>42149406 #>>42149518 #>>42149554 #>>42149705 #>>42149979 #>>42150271 #>>42150314 #>>42151333 #>>42151610 #
paxys ◴[] No.42148339[source]
Sounds like the system worked exactly as intended then. A seemingly smart person got a good job. What's the problem with this story exactly?
replies(7): >>42148421 #>>42148466 #>>42148494 #>>42149125 #>>42149358 #>>42149519 #>>42151724 #
pmg101 ◴[] No.42148421[source]
A moderately smart person was selected for a good job perhaps over many many better possible hires simply because that person had the leisure to learn the game. Inefficient. But nice for that individual, naturally.
replies(5): >>42148965 #>>42149145 #>>42149365 #>>42149704 #>>42150297 #
FartyMcFarter ◴[] No.42148965[source]
But is there a good way to find the "better possible hires" which doesn't have other significant disadvantages? If you have a convincing method of doing that, many companies would be interested in your ideas.
replies(3): >>42149053 #>>42149068 #>>42149274 #
pydry ◴[] No.42149053[source]
Yes, ask give interview tasks which are realistic depictions of the actual job tasks.

No, the hiring managers that are into cargoogle culting are not actually that interested in how to do interviewing properly. Not unless, say, google does it and they can copy it.

For them the important thing is that leetcode is a safe, defensible choice because "everyone else does it that way".

replies(3): >>42149175 #>>42149630 #>>42151518 #
FartyMcFarter ◴[] No.42149175{3}[source]
> Yes, ask give interview tasks which are realistic depictions of the actual job tasks.

I think this is exactly what a lot of companies try to do when interviewing. Depending on how much time they want candidates and interviewers to spend on the task, this ranges from leetcode-style problems to bigger coding challenges (possibly with some debugging or collaboration involved).

What would you suggest concretely?

replies(1): >>42171681 #
1. pydry ◴[] No.42171681{4}[source]
A lot of companies do do it this way but the ones that set leetcode problems are deliberately avoiding setting realistic interview tasks.

If you think leetcode is representative of real life programming you're probably a college student.