←back to thread

116 points wslh | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
amatecha ◴[] No.42162344[source]
The degree of wisdom and truly "evolved" thinking demonstrated in this letter is deeply inspiring. Simultaneously, it conversely seems to support the idea that you can't really reason with fascists because their hunger for power (and destruction) is essentially insatiable and they won't stop because someone spoke some convincing words.
replies(3): >>42162476 #>>42162658 #>>42166055 #
throwaway10oct ◴[] No.42162476[source]
I respectfully disagree because Gandhi's approach may seem idealistic, but in reality, nature functions on the basis of survival of the fittest.

Nonviolent methods often require the possibility of violence as a backdrop to be effective. Otherwise, they might not yield the desired results.

While Gandhi's philosophy sounds nice in theory, it may not always be the most practical in real-world scenarios.

replies(7): >>42162504 #>>42162558 #>>42162601 #>>42165691 #>>42166509 #>>42167007 #>>42167760 #
iwantgandhi ◴[] No.42162601[source]
"While Gandhi's philosophy sounds nice in theory, it may not always be the most practical in real-world scenarios."

You do know his philosophy worked, right?

replies(6): >>42162633 #>>42162660 #>>42162682 #>>42163163 #>>42163166 #>>42164288 #
ConfiYeti ◴[] No.42164288[source]
We gained independence when it was inconvenient for the British to continue their rule over India. While his work can not be understated, you also can't deny that it took a very long time. During that long period: Indians fought under British banners and died, and Indians were systematically starved to feed frontlines of war we had nothing to do with.

Just imagine getting independence 5 years earlier by nationwide violent uprisings and non-cooperation moment together. Britain was already fighting on multiple fronts during WW2, it was a plausible path to early independence.

Sure we saved some lives that would've been lost in violent uprisings, but we lost just as many if not more from inaction.

replies(3): >>42164513 #>>42165581 #>>42171278 #
1. randomcarbloke ◴[] No.42171278[source]
>Indians were systematically starved to feed frontlines of war we had nothing to do with

By a cyclone, accidents, and japanese blockades, the independent states suffered more because of poor infrastructure, lastly it was only known to Britain come August '43 whereupon 150,000 tonnes of wheat were redirected from Iraq and Aus.

replies(1): >>42175413 #
2. cholantesh ◴[] No.42175413[source]
This is the view advanced by Churchill and his hagiographers but it's false; there is correspondence from 1942 that warned that the ramifications of policies going all the way to March of that year had been dire, and the war cabinet simply dismissed them.