←back to thread

304 points mooreds | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
TimTheTinker ◴[] No.42168638[source]
I always thought Windows (until 7) looked so lacking in polish around the edges compared to even the earliest versions of Macintosh system software -- especially during install, boot, crash, and shutdown. During boot, for example, even modern Windows boxes [correction: pre-EFI only] show a BIOS screen followed by a brief blinking cursor before the Windows graphics mode takes over. It was much worse in earlier versions.

The Macintosh screen never dropped you into a text-mode console, no matter what. Everything on the screen was graphics-mode, always -- and there weren't glaring design changes between system versions like in Windows (except at the Mac OS X introduction, which was entirely new).

Installing Macintosh system software onto a HDD was literally as easy as copying the System Folder. System installer programs did exist, but in principle all that was happening was optionally formatting the target drive and then copying System Folder contents. So simple. Of course there were problems and shortcomings, but the uncompromising design esthetic is noteworthy and admirable.

replies(5): >>42168694 #>>42168715 #>>42169456 #>>42171011 #>>42189597 #
1. mattkevan ◴[] No.42171011[source]
I somehow managed to avoid PCs and Windows as a kid – at home we went from Amiga > Acorn > Mac and my school was 100% Acorn.

I was always astonished going to friends' houses and watching them have to use DOS or Windows 3.1 and weird 5" disks. Just looked like it was from the past. Even Windows 95 looked terrible on boot with all the wonky graphics and walls of console text. I was convinced Windows would never catch on and Amiga or Acorn was the future as they were so much better.