←back to thread

511 points moonsword | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.25s | source | bottom
Show context
jjallen ◴[] No.42170596[source]
If this is such a security benefit why not do it after 24 hours instead? How many people go that long without using their phones?

How many people are using their phones for some other purpose for which they want their phones to never reboot? And what are they actually doing with their phones?

replies(2): >>42170657 #>>42175380 #
1. saagarjha ◴[] No.42170657[source]
Because it harms the user experience.
replies(2): >>42170699 #>>42171549 #
2. jjallen ◴[] No.42170699[source]
How though? Users haven't used their phone in a day or more? How would they notice except for having to reenter their passcode which takes two seconds?
replies(2): >>42170710 #>>42170946 #
3. IshKebab ◴[] No.42170710[source]
Read the introduction.
4. Shank ◴[] No.42170946[source]
Not being able to glance at any push notifications or get incoming caller ID would be pretty disruptive.
replies(1): >>42175392 #
5. Wowfunhappy ◴[] No.42171549[source]
I'm sure this is why but I had the same thought as GP. Under what circumstances would 24 hours be disruptive, but three days would be okay?

If you're using the iPhone as some type of IoT appliance, either time limit would be disruptive. But if you e.g. enable Guided Access, the phone will stay unlocked and so shouldn't reboot.

If you're using the iPhone as a phone, who the heck doesn't touch their phone in 24 hours? Maybe if you're on some phone-free camping trip and you just need the iPhone with you as an emergency backup—but in that case, I don't think Inactivity Reboot would be particularly disruptive.

Maybe Apple will lower the window over time?

6. layer8 ◴[] No.42175392{3}[source]
That’s not the case if you also have other Apple devices on the same account.