←back to thread

248 points rishicomplex | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.444s | source
Show context
throwaway713 ◴[] No.42167915[source]
Anyone else feel like mathematics is sort of the endgame? I.e., once ML can do it better than humans, that’s basically it?
replies(11): >>42168138 #>>42168188 #>>42168552 #>>42169054 #>>42169223 #>>42169808 #>>42170065 #>>42170119 #>>42170460 #>>42171863 #>>42197083 #
1. awanderingmind ◴[] No.42170460[source]
The end of an era perhaps, but not 'the end' - another commenter has already mentioned Moravec's paradox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox

It will be interesting if/when these models start proving major open problems, e.g. the Riemann Hypothesis. The sociological impact on the mathematical community would certainly be acute, and likely lead to a seismic shift in the understanding of what research-level mathematics is 'for'. This discussion already appears to be in progress. As an outsider I have no idea what the timeline is for such things (2 years? 10? 100?).

On the plus side, AlphaProof has the benefit over ordinary LLMs in their current form in that it does not pollute our common epistemological well, and its output is eminently interrogable (if you know Lean at last).