←back to thread

167 points billybuckwheat | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.812s | source
1. cameldrv ◴[] No.42170002[source]
I don't get why these companies would want to keep employing someone who has stated that they want to quit.
replies(3): >>42170396 #>>42170836 #>>42171862 #
2. wruza ◴[] No.42170396[source]
Same. It’s over, you won’t get performance or loyalty above some cold baseline, while still paying for the most expensive class of resources. What’s the point even?

I can guess that maybe it’s a well-known cultural thing that only prevents people of this culture to think about leaving. A sort of a group control thing.

3. twelve40 ◴[] No.42170836[source]
if I was a douchebag boss, I would manipulate them into staying then publicly reprimand and fire them shortly thereafter to come out a "winner" in the situation. I haven't seen managers stoop that low yet, but state-side I've seen managers take extreme personal offense and paranoia about team morale when there was even one flight risk on the horizon. (omg they didn't even pay $100k for their once-in-a-lifetime chance to exercise our magic stock!)
replies(1): >>42171309 #
4. master-lincoln ◴[] No.42171309[source]
Where I live, getting fired entails getting severance. Something you don't get when quitting. I would rather be fired then to quit myself...
5. _rm ◴[] No.42171862[source]
If your dog, which is your property, decided it just wanted to go live across the street instead, would you just shrug and say OK?

That's basically their mindset.