←back to thread

210 points lapnect | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.448s | source
Show context
brookst ◴[] No.42165080[source]
Great writing style on the README. It’s always nice when a corporate tool has docs that were obviously written by people who are having fun at their jobs.
replies(2): >>42165195 #>>42165302 #
xwn ◴[] No.42165195[source]
Thanks! Wrote it loooong before it was a corporate tool and was only a labor of love. Now it's both
replies(1): >>42166697 #
sdesol[dead post] ◴[] No.42166697[source]
[flagged]
sdesol ◴[] No.42168000[source]
I guess I was a bit direct but I don't fully understand the down vote. I was not implying that the README was bad and it does have corrections that would improve it. My reason for not raising a PR is some repo owners don't care and I really didn't want to go through the effort unless they actually care.
replies(3): >>42169731 #>>42170235 #>>42170330 #
1. cortesoft ◴[] No.42169731[source]
The downvotes were probably because the comment felt like an ad for your tool
replies(1): >>42170761 #
2. squigz ◴[] No.42170761[source]
This, and nobody asked, and it was irrelevant to the comment thread.