←back to thread

304 points mooreds | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.638s | source
1. rbanffy ◴[] No.42167807[source]
If they were going to install a bare Windows 3, they could at least make an effort to ship a bare 95.
replies(1): >>42174937 #
2. Kwpolska ◴[] No.42174937[source]
Why would they do that? The only thing this could change is a slightly prettier UI, they still needed a 16-bit Windows 3.x-compatible install program. Not worth the extra effort and extra floppies.
replies(1): >>42177013 #
3. rbanffy ◴[] No.42177013[source]
If they made a bare 95, the 16-bit installer could just reboot into it.