←back to thread

399 points gmays | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.647s | source | bottom
1. henry2023 ◴[] No.42167111[source]
Governments won’t act. The best you can do to help with the climate crisis is to have one less kid than what you wanted to have.
replies(2): >>42167137 #>>42167624 #
2. shdh ◴[] No.42167137[source]
That's likely not a real solution either.

Encouraging a small minority of HN users to not have an additional child won't move the needle.

It'll likely just remove a person capable of some level of critical thinking from the population pool.

replies(2): >>42167157 #>>42167285 #
3. hollerith ◴[] No.42167157[source]
I agree, but at least we can discourage people from saying things like, "Russia is doomed because of demographic collapse," when we are just guessing about the effects of a slow down of the birth rate on the economy of a country long term.
replies(1): >>42167307 #
4. henry2023 ◴[] No.42167285[source]
Critical thinking capable people are more likely to work for an ad-corporation whose only side effect is to increase consumption and therefore increase emissions.
5. shdh ◴[] No.42167307{3}[source]
Korean and Japanese birth rates are very low.

The West is following suit.

We'll likely see a global population decline.

6. moffkalast ◴[] No.42167624[source]
Okay, but having 255 kids sounds like a problem?