←back to thread

492 points storf45 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.405s | source
Show context
shermantanktop ◴[] No.42160502[source]
Every time a big company screws up, there are two highly informed sets of people who are guaranteed to be lurking, but rarely post, in a thread like this:

1) those directly involved with the incident, or employees of the same company. They have too much to lose by circumventing the PR machine.

2) people at similar companies who operate similar systems with similar scale and risks. Those people know how hard this is and aren’t likely to publicly flog someone doing their same job based on uninformed speculation. They know their own systems are Byzantine and don’t look like what random onlookers think it would look like.

So that leaves the rest, who offer insights based on how stuff works at a small scale, or better yet, pronouncements rooted in “first principles.”

replies(15): >>42160568 #>>42160576 #>>42160579 #>>42160888 #>>42160913 #>>42161148 #>>42161164 #>>42161399 #>>42161529 #>>42161703 #>>42161724 #>>42161889 #>>42165352 #>>42166894 #>>42167814 #
1. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.42166894[source]
I'm sure 2) can post. But it won't be popular, so you'll need to dig to find it.

Most people are consumers and at the end of the day, their ability to consume a (boring) match was disrupted. If this was PPV (I don't think it is) the paid extra to not get the quality of product they expected. I'm not surprised they dominate the conversation.

replies(1): >>42172326 #
2. bobdvb ◴[] No.42172326[source]
I am 2, I absolutely will get argued with by people who think they know better.

I'm also not going to criticise my peers because they could recognise me and I might want to work with them one day.