←back to thread

389 points kurinikku | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.409s | source
Show context
blackeyeblitzar ◴[] No.42165532[source]
A computer fundamentally isn’t functions though. That’s not how a processor works. If functions are a useful abstraction, why haven’t functional languages taken off?
replies(3): >>42165967 #>>42167317 #>>42168684 #
1. doublepg23 ◴[] No.42165967[source]
It seems functional language experts are too busy rewriting SICP instead of actually useful programs.
replies(1): >>42166398 #
2. blackeyeblitzar ◴[] No.42166398[source]
I just haven’t seen anything concrete as to why SICP’s materials are useful in either the real world or academia. Sometimes these discussions talk about how it is useful for computer science and for theory but even that seems like a claim without evidence. Is this just people reminiscing about their first introduction to programming or a favorite professor?