←back to thread

116 points wslh | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
Simon_ORourke ◴[] No.42162689[source]
Not putting too fine a point on it, but Gandhi's non-violent resistance worked in the India of his time, because the British wanted both the labor and the natural resources, and killing all the former would simply have cost them.

In Gaza and Ukraine right now, the colonial powers simply want the territory, and are largely indifferent or are openly hostile to the continued physical existence of the people who live there.

replies(6): >>42162919 #>>42164064 #>>42165833 #>>42165946 #>>42166882 #>>42168613 #
1. throw0101b ◴[] No.42165833[source]
> Not putting too fine a point on it, but Gandhi's non-violent resistance worked in the India of his time, because the British wanted both the labor and the natural resources, and killing all the former would simply have cost them.

Also worked in Poland with Solidarity against the Communists. Also worked in the Philippines with People Power:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_Power_Revolution

Etc:

> They focused on cases of “nonviolent mass mobilization featuring at least one thousand observed participants seeking maximalist (country level) goals [such as the overthrow of a government or territorial independence, (see p.13] from 1900 to 2006 [now updated to 2019]. We did not count smaller campaigns, or reform movements” (p. xx). It took them two years to put the data set together, but it was well worth it – after analyzing those data, in 2011 they published their results in their highly acclaimed book, Why Civil Resistance Works, which received the prestigious Woodrow Wilson Prize of the American Political Science Association. Chenoweth and Stephan found that “[m]ore than half of the campaigns that relied primarily on nonviolent resistance succeeded, whereas only about a quarter of the violent ones did” (p. xx).

* https://www.peacejusticestudies.org/chronicle/review-of-civi...