←back to thread

210 points lapnect | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.806s | source | bottom
1. mdaniel ◴[] No.42165175[source]
Ah, this is an ((LLM vulnerability) scanner) not (LLM (vulnerability scanner)) which I thought would be a terrible idea and couldn't understand why everyone was joking about the lies. I also am not a Trekkie, so I had to look up all the tailor references but the character's philosophy makes sense for the name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elim_Garak#:~:text=the%20truth...
replies(3): >>42165237 #>>42168930 #>>42173576 #
2. xwn ◴[] No.42165237[source]
Check the last entry in the FAQ source
replies(2): >>42165307 #>>42170959 #
3. mdaniel ◴[] No.42165307[source]
I think you mean the last entry on the readme[1], as the last entry in the FAQ is about the meaning of pass/fail in the score

1: https://github.com/NVIDIA/garak/blob/d8bd12ea969eec377326241...

replies(1): >>42167735 #
4. layer8 ◴[] No.42167735{3}[source]
No, they mean the last entry in the FAQ’s source.
5. punkspider ◴[] No.42168930[source]
Thank you for clarifying. I also initially thought it was an (LLM (vulnerability scanner)).
replies(1): >>42170009 #
6. xarope ◴[] No.42170009[source]
must be a reflection how people are thinking; since I'm infosec oriented, I interpreted it as ((LLM vulnerability) scanner)
7. rob74 ◴[] No.42170959[source]
Ah, ok, good catch! Makes sense to hide the FAQ entry explaining the origin of the name, seeing that the DS9 Garak character was also "undercover".
replies(1): >>42172849 #
8. TeMPOraL ◴[] No.42172849{3}[source]
There is also a quote by a certain individual named Elim visible, in the clear, near the end of README. I'm guessing that Elim is likely just a simple tailor.
9. htrp ◴[] No.42173576[source]
Any one have a good (LLM (vulnerability scanner) list?