←back to thread

885 points thunderbong | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
langsoul-com ◴[] No.42162264[source]
> The color was originally going to be called beccapurple, but Meyer asked that it instead be named rebeccapurple, as his daughter had wanted to be called Rebecca once she had turned six. She had said that Becca was a "baby name," and that once she had turned six, she wanted to be called Rebecca. As Eric Meyer put it, "She made it to six. For almost twelve hours, she was six. So Rebecca it is and must be."

Wasn't expecting tears over a colour

replies(5): >>42162624 #>>42165500 #>>42166676 #>>42167838 #>>42167844 #
jvm___ ◴[] No.42162624[source]
..in 2014 in honor of Eric Meyer's daughter, Rebecca, who passed away at the age of six on her birthday from brain cancer.
replies(1): >>42163561 #
userbinator[dead post] ◴[] No.42163561[source]
[flagged]
zanellato19 ◴[] No.42163674[source]
It's the sort of emotions over logic we need more, you mean.
replies(3): >>42163758 #>>42164111 #>>42164436 #
1. kibwen ◴[] No.42164436{3}[source]
Not even this. There's no "logical" argument against it. The CSS color names are largely arbitrary and always have been (e.g. "indigo" is a shade of purple, when IRL indigo is the plant that produces the dye for blue jeans). Color names in general have been arbitrary since long before Newton coined ROYGBIV and decided to use "blue" to mean what we call "cyan" today.

It's an attitude that presumes that we can apply logic to all walks of life, which ironically is an inherently illogical stance.

replies(1): >>42165791 #
2. hombre_fatal ◴[] No.42165791[source]
Yeah, that's the main oversight of the OP that makes them look silly.

There was no logic to the naming scheme. It was all arbitrary, and the names came in waves from various sources like house paint colors, Crayolas, and the whims of people behind various implementations.

If they replaced '#663399' with 'rebeccapurple' maybe they'd have a point.